Without anything underneath: that 'basic instinct' that you like more and more
„Increasingly widespread among VIPs and not only the fashion of" forgetting "the briefs. Do you want real freedom or exhibitionism? "
"
rhyme or then there are waterfalls a bit all, from the stars of our house, such as Alessia Fabiani, Elisabetta Canalis, Alessia Marcuzzi, to international ones, such as Britney Spears, Emma Watson (pictured) or Miley Cyrus.
Sharon Stone has also done the same thing, but with a completely different class, in the now legendary scene of the film "Basic Instinct", a milestone in Overtrocean eroticism.
The "fact" in question consists in the fatal forgetfulness of wearing an essential garment of underwear - more precisely of the briefs!
This type of forgetfulness seems to have been infecting more and more VIPs lately, but also women who are not part of the notorious and notoriously sinful world of entertainment.
For centuries the head of exclusive male use, only at the beginning of the nineteenth century, underpants became part of women's underwear, in the form of long tubular slings also called pipes of decency.
Since then, the underpants have come a long way and are currently often reduced to a few square centimeters of fabric, which often represent the last barrier before the "en plein air" performance of the intimate parts.
"
Without anything underneath: that 'basic instinct' that you like more and more
"
Despite the smallness of current briefs, it seems that there is an aversion for many women to their use, as well as the incorrigible tendency to forget their wearing, perhaps just under a short, tight skirt, with easily imaginable results.
Generally it is fatal to exit the car or taxi - Britney Spears docet - but there are many situations in which the photographer's indiscreet lens has caught glimpses of bare skin where decency would have wanted any fabric to exist.
And if for some it was an unfortunate although predictable "accident", for others it was a real voluntary performance, as in the case of Sara Tommasi, who deliberately raised her skirt in a restaurant in Via Veneto to show the I photograph the landscape.
Particular sensation caused the appearance of Belen Rodriguez, during the last Sanremo Festival, dressed - or rather "undressed" - in a dress with an inguinal slit, which revealed the famous butterfly tattooed just "on site".
With the class and the gentleness that distinguish her, the beautiful Brazilian then reassured the right-thinking people by issuing a series of press releases about her favorite pant models: it seems that in that specific case Belen was not "dismissed", but protected by a microslip incorporated into the dress. Very interesting, isn't it?
Without anything underneath: that 'basic instinct' that you like more and more
"
However, whether or not Belen belongs to the category of "without underwear" is not so important, the fact remains that many women like both the feeling of free skin and the idea that it can be observed by strangers, perhaps provoking sexual arousal.
On the net, many Sharon emulas tell in different forums, centered on sex habits, their preference:
"I am excited by the idea of being naked under my miniskirt and being able to excite the men I accidentally come into contact with." "I do it on purpose not to wear my underwear and to cross my legs when I sit down, causing a great embarrassment to those in front of me"; "It is very pleasant to go out with the short skirt and nothing underneath, I feel the air that caresses my skin and I feel a feeling of growing excitement"; "I can't stand the idea of wearing tight linen: both under my pants and under my skirt I'm always naked, and if someone notices it, it doesn't bother me at all";
“I never wear anything under my skirts. Once a girl in a shopping center told me if I could follow her in the toilets, I followed her because I was excited and we made love, then she gave me her thong. "
The exhibitionist component in these behaviors seems to be quite remarkable, the same that probably affects the attitudes of many stars, who would do anything to always be the center of attention.
As can be seen from the various forums, the choice to "split up" can also be a real couple game conducted in harmony with the partner:
"I have a great feeling of freedom when I do not wear underwear, if I wear skirts I feel very comfortable, it does not create any problem for me when walking or sitting when I cross my legs men realize that I am not wearing anything, rather I enjoy to provoke them even in the presence of my husband ";
Without anything underneath: that 'basic instinct' that you like more and more
"
“If my wife is wearing pants, she has strictly a mini thong, possibly transparent. With the miniskirt, on the other hand, the absence of underwear is de rigueur, she likes to be observed under the skirt and I also really like to see what effect other men do "
What to say? Reading the amount of evidence on the matter, it seems that the habit of not wearing underwear is widespread and pleasantly practiced, also accomplices to husbands and companions.
The dividing line between a simply risque attitude and a real exhibitionist behavior however seems rather weak, it is certain however that in the last few years a sort of revolution has occurred in the sexual field, which now makes "normal" behaviors even once considered almost pathological.
This is the case with sexting, for example, the act of exchanging self-portraits and hard videos via mobile phone or Iphone, which has become so common that psychologists cannot associate it with particular pathological situations.
In short, it may be that even to circulate without underwear you must all get used to it, and that you get to consider it as a simple preference in terms of clothing: “Underpants? No thanks!"
"
