One of the key points raised by Gary Goldsmith is the absence of substantial evidence supporting Meghan's claim of motherhood. He references an old BBC exclusive investigation report alleging Meghan's failed IVF treatment, arguing that if her IVF treatment was unsuccessful, it raises doubts about her ability to be a biological mother. This leads to the logical conclusion that Archie and Lilibet could be surrogated or, as Goldsmith boldly suggests, entirely fabricated.
The revelation of the alleged failed IVF treatment adds a layer of skepticism to Meghan's narrative. If Meghan cannot provide proof of her successful IVF treatment, it casts a shadow over the authenticity of her claims. Goldsmith's challenge ignites the demand for transparency and concrete evidence, urging Meghan to substantiate her assertions about Archie and Lilibet.
In addition to questioning the existence of Meghan's children, Goldsmith exposes another facet of Meghan's narrative: her claims of being a victim of cyberbullying. He challenges Meghan to provide evidence to support her assertions, dismissing her statements as mere words without substance.
The discussion on Meghan's position within the royal family takes an intriguing turn as Gary Goldsmith criticizes Meghan for allegedly breaking up the trio of Prince William, Prince Harry, and Kate Middleton. This critique aligns with the sentiments of those who believe Meghan's entrance into the royal fold brought about a significant shift in dynamics.
As we navigate through the twists and turns of this royal saga, it becomes increasingly clear that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry face mounting scrutiny. The call for proof challenges from unexpected quarters and the unveiling of alleged inconsistencies in Meghan's story contribute to the controversy surrounding the couple.
